JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 28, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Elmer Ramiro Silva Rodriguez·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Reposición.

El memorialista presentó recurso de reposición contra el A208/12, mediante el cual la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional declaró la improcedencia de la causal de recusación formulada contra los magistrados de la Corporación.

La Sala encuentra que el denominado recurso de reposición interpuesto por el peticionario es improcedente y en consecuencia, decide RECHAZAR el recurso impetrado..

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente el "recurso de reposicion" interpuesto por el ciudadano Elmer Ramiro Silva Rodriguez contra el Auto de 208 de 19 de septiembre de 2012.
  2. Contra lo resuelto en este auto no existe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.